Richmond disagrees with the magazine element because "people are less and less inclined to pay for bundles of content" and the RSS-fuelled Daily Me (Frighteningly, Negroponte's idea is over a decade old) is a "model of media consumption that leads me to believe that media delivery to portable devices (phones, PDAs, electronic readers, flexible displays etc) will, at some stage in the future, supersede ink-on-paper media. I think so, others in the room disagreed."
I'm of the mind to agree that portable devices and the My Google-style personalised news page will come to dominate news consumption, but that paper will continue to have an important role for the reason that RSS still requires you to select what interests you, whereas paper presents a browsing experience different to the 'search-and-scan' approach online. Research shows people are very task-oriented when they go online; a paper is an opportunity to come across stories you wouldn't otherwise find; and in a local paper context, get an overall picture of what's happening.
Now, two things may change this: first, social recommendation. When those whose judgement we trust begin to drive our news consumption in a mainstream way, the editor's role becomes, if not redundant, at least transplanted. Second: screen resolution. When reading a story online or on a portable device becomes as comfortable as reading paper, we may drop the search-and-scan approach.
As for magazines, as I've written elsewhere, I think one future for them is as facilitators of virtual communities - a forward thinking magazine publisher will be investing in social recommendation software, forums, reader-editors and expert bloggers right now...
Save this story on del.icio.us / Digg this story
Paul Bradshaw lectures on the Journalism degree at UCE Birmingham media department. He writes a number of blogs including the Online Journalism Blog, Interactive PR and Web and New Media